On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 20:50, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote:
> 2011/7/11 Bernd Fondermann <[email protected]>:
>> My interpretation is that technically this vote is about the
>> james/server/trunk code at rev 1145273, as is currently contained in
>> (and per convention this will never change)
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/james-server-3.0-beta2/
>
> That was my interpretation, too (BTW the convention is not enforced
> and in past we removed and recreated tags after failed votes, and
> that's why I prefer to not reroll releases but skip to the next
> version number)
>
> I preferred the way we voted in the past years where we always
> released a source package and voted that package (and in past I've
> been told this is also the apache policy, so I don't see why we should
> change it now).
>
> Note I'm not vetoing the release, I'm just reporting my concerns.

I agree that it's not good if PMC members feel it's too hard to take
part in a release vote.

  Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to