2012/2/21 Eric Charles <e...@apache.org>: > Hi Stefano, > See comment inside. > > I will cancel the vote and relaunch a new one after fixing assembly. > > Thx for your review, Eric
Thanks to you for the hard work! Reviewing is easy compared to pushing releases! > On 21/02/12 12:01, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >> (http://apache.fastbull.org/james/apache-jsieve/0.4/apache-james-jsieve-0.4-src.zip) >> , so maybe something gone wrong with the latest pom changes or with >> the release process. > > src are available: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-003/org/apache/james/apache-jsieve-core/0.5/apache-jsieve-core-0.5-sources.jar > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-003/org/apache/james/apache-jsieve-mailet/0.5/apache-jsieve-mailet-0.5-sources.jar > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejames-003/org/apache/james/apache-jsieve-util/0.5/apache-jsieve-util-0.5-sources.jar > > ... but a single tarball with all of them is not... - I had issues with the > assemble module, desactivated it for the release, now I fixed it. I'm not sure this is "right", as they are not the full sources of our product: they don't include the root stuff (like the website and release notes) and they don't include tests. One thing to check after you fix the assembly is the LICENSE/NOTICE for the bin assembly: they have to include references to the jars included in the binary tar. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org