I would favor git, it's much simpler to develop and maintain patches with git(hub) until it's merged.
Regards, Zsombor On Thu Sep 27 10:34:25 GMT+200 2012, Eric Charles <[email protected]>. wrote: Sounds like a reasonable plan. In the meantime, if there are any barrier to contribute with the current SVN, just tell us so we can help. Thx, Eric On 27/09/2012 03:12, Saibabu Vallurupalli wrote: > Add me as well +1 > > > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I've noticed the possibility to switch to Git for Apache projects. I >> believe working with git is faster at accepting external >> contributions, especially that Github is so popular, and a lot of >> people fork and work on local projects. >> >> I also know that we probably don't have the resources yet, but how do >> you feel about moving James to git as primary development? I think it >> will speed up development and adoption as it's easier to play with. >> >> Some talks about the process: >> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/lucy-dev-Moving-to-Git-td4006735.html >> >> Cheers, >> >> -- >> Ioan Eugen Stan / CTO / http://axemblr.com >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
