På fredag 03. desember 2021 kl. 09:43:32, skrev btell...@apache.org 
<mailto:btell...@apache.org> <btell...@apache.org <mailto:btell...@apache.org>>:
Hello Andreas,

I spent literally a day running the release, I would have had enjoyed having 
such kind of feedbacks earlier, for instance when I first spoke about my will 
to move forward with 3.6.1 (15/09/2021 [1]) and then asked for help for the 
backports (16/09/2021 [2]).

[1] https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg71028.html 
<https://www.mail-archive.com/server-dev@james.apache.org/msg71028.html>
[2] 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3564?focusedCommentId=17415842&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17415842
 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3564?focusedCommentId=17415842&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17415842>

What changeset would you consider critical for a MIME4J upgrade? On 3.6.x we 
shall minimize changes in order to provide stability and only target bugfixes.

I'm not personally interested in 3.6.x backports, thus I would appreciate the 
community to involve more on this topic.


I understnad, but these issues:

https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/65 
<https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/65>
https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/66 
<https://github.com/apache/james-mime4j/pull/66>

…were not merged/fixed at the time. Now that they are merged it becomes 
relevant.




--
Andreas Joseph Krogh
CTO / Partner - Visena AS
Mobile: +47 909 56 963
andr...@visena.com <mailto:andr...@visena.com>
www.visena.com <https://www.visena.com>
 <https://www.visena.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-h...@james.apache.org

Reply via email to