"Roy Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jerry,
It ALREADY is a pretty neat product. It APPEARS to have a future direction
of enhancement which looks good. HOWEVER, I think you really need to cut a
stable version of 2.2 and get that issued. Additionally, this list is very
good at responding to questions - even from James-101s like me - but the
documentation could do with some work. I think a practical user-guide would
complement the reference material which is already there.
Thanks for your feedback. Documentation is always a challenge, and unfortunately the docs right now are spread across a) published html docs in the downloads, b) Wiki notes and c) mailing list archives. We do need some organization to merge Wiki and publsihed site info as well as extract more nuggets and tutorials from the mailing list archives.
In closing, none of this is meant to be critical - honest. It's meant to be
objective and constructive. I am sure the James Group know all this stuff
already - but it would be nice to have some indication of timeframe for the
product evolution.
We split the 2.X and 3.X branch over a year ago, and it was never meant to take this long. Our most active developer is the midst of a huge merge as the two branches were not 100% kept up to date. Once the merge is complete, a) pent up changes will get committed and b) resources will be more available to move forward.
We greatly appreciate your feedback and as always, would love some extra help. :)
-- Serge Knystautas
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
