.. thanks Serge. If I ever graduate from James-101 then maybe I'll be in a position to offer some assistance - although it would be restricted to the documentation area I think.
Couple more questions for you if I may: 1) Will the merge and next stable cut be a 2.x or 3.0 ? Obviously not crucial, more just curious ... 2) I'm still in evaluation mode just now with only a small number of users. Would I be as well to move to 2.2 now or should I stick with 2.1.3 ? I guess the underlying question really is "Is 2.2 now good enough, or is it still considered flakey?" Thanks, Roy -----Original Message----- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] We split the 2.X and 3.X branch over a year ago, and it was never meant to take this long. Our most active developer is the midst of a huge merge as the two branches were not 100% kept up to date. Once the merge is complete, a) pent up changes will get committed and b) resources will be more available to move forward. We greatly appreciate your feedback and as always, would love some extra help. :) -- Serge Knystautas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------- [This message has been routed via James V2.1.3 on REBEX-MERCURY] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
