Chemi wrote:
> I have develop a simple test case where I post a NNTP message
> I have to force a \n\n at the end of the body to read it later
> without problems. If I don't send "\n\n" at the end.... I have
> again the same problem.
I'll check the code to see how our NNTP handler is differing from our SMTP
handler. They had different development paths, but we should be using the
same approaches to handling the content.
> is James wrong?
Possibly. There may have been some changed assumption(s) about what was
being stored on receipt, and what was to be emitted later.
I will reiterate that it sounds as if there are several of you eager to use
NNTP, which is the first real traffic on the protocol that we've seen in at
least a year, so I'd encourage you to get involved. :-) There is a lot
that can be done to improve the NNTP handling.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
