I suppose I could have used the SenderHostIs matcher.

--- Lahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I dont see a case where the built-in James matchers
> cant be used for what u want to achieve. Wonder what
> caused u to build up ur own.
> Use built-in James matchers for all such purposes
> !They *WORK*. Period.
> 
> regards 
> lahu
> 
> --- Carl Downs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I am trying to intercept outbound Mail 
> > sent by a James user.  The interception 
> > should work whether the recipient is 
> > another local James user or a user on 
> > some other MTA.
> > 
> > I built a Matcher that signals when
> > the Mail 'sender' field is a local
> > user.  The Matcher/Mailet pair fires 
> > but does not do what I had expected.
> > 
> > First, the matched Mail instance seems
> > odd in that its 'recipient' is set to the 
> > actual 'sender' field.  The sender did not 
> > include himself in the 'to' field.
> > 
> > Second, even though the Mailet changes
> > state of the above odd Mail to 'ghost' the 
> > Mail is delivered anyway to the actual 
> > recipient.
> > 
> > Im my tests, the recipient is also a local
> > James user, but I didn't think that would 
> > make any difference.
> > 
> > Question:
> > 
> > I think the fact that the Mail was delivered 
> > to the recipient anyway tells me that the 
> > Mail was 'split' somethere in by the 
> > processor tree.  I ghost'd the matched
> > copy but the original (?) was unaffected, 
> > causing the mail to be delivered anyway.  
> > Wrong?
> > 
> > Question:
> > 
> > Anyone know why the odd recipient=sender 
> > behavior described above might occur?
> > 
> > Question:
> > 
> > I had assumed that *any* mail sent to James 
> > goes through the spool / processors whether 
> > submitted from SMTP, FetchPOP, POP, or what 
> > have you.  Is mail submitted by a POP client
> > actually handled differently in some way?
> > 
> > Question:
> > 
> > Ok.  My technique is FU.  What is the correct
> > Matcher technique for intercepting this type 
> > of 'outbound' mail?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Carl
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >             
> > _______________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> > http://vote.yahoo.com
> > 
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>               
> _______________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
> http://vote.yahoo.com
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 



                
_______________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!
http://vote.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to