I would also add my vote for +1 for abandoning 1.4 and go for 5.0 as we are already there too.
Mark On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:19 PM, rafael.munoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 for abandoning 1.4 and go for 5.0 > > I work in a very conservative Fortune 500 company and even us have already > move to 5.0 ... > > > robert burrell donkin-2 wrote: >> >> java 1.4 is now official EOL'd. the james 3.0 codebase currently >> targets 1.4 but switching to 1.5 would make quite a lot of exciting >> stuff (such as JPA data stores and annotated mailets) much easier. the >> consensus amongst the developers is that the time is now right to >> abandon Java 1.4 for 3.0 (with james 2.x continuing to support Java >> 1.4) but we'd like to give users a chance to give some feedback on >> this. >> >> so if anyone has an opinion, please dive in >> >> - robert >> >> --8<------------------------------------------------------------------- >> [ ] +1 James 3.0 -> Java 1.5 >> [ ] -1 Keep James 3.0 on Java 1.4 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-POLL--Target-Java-1.5-for-James-3.0--tp20311444p20312134.html > Sent from the James - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
