Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> java 1.4 is now official EOL'd. the james 3.0 codebase currently
> targets 1.4 but switching to 1.5 would make quite a lot of exciting
> stuff (such as JPA data stores and annotated mailets) much easier. the
> consensus amongst the developers is that the time is now right to
> abandon Java 1.4 for 3.0 (with james 2.x continuing to support Java
> 1.4) but we'd like to give users a chance to give some feedback on
> this.
> 
> so if anyone has an opinion, please dive in
> 
> - robert

--8<-------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] +1 James 3.0 -> Java 1.5
[ ] -1 Keep James 3.0 on Java 1.4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stefano

PS: There was already a "[poll] JAMES Server and Java2 1.4" from me the
 day before ;-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to