Thanks for the reply Eric.

 

I require a very basic mail server without any local mail boxes to migrate an 
existing 2.3 project. Given my limited requirements Is it sensible to use the 
beta5 trunk build and forget about beta4 all together? If not, how I would 
create a distribution build using the beta4 source without the assembly.




Kind regards,

Johnny Minty



From: Eric Charles
Sent: ‎9‎ ‎January‎ ‎2013 ‎7‎:‎41‎ ‎p.m.
To: James Users List
Subject: Re: Apache James 3.0-beta4 build



Hi,
For beta4 release, you need to checkout [1] and build it.
For trunk (beta5-SNAPSHOT), the assembly is back is a server module [2]

Thx, Eric

[1] 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/tags/apache-james-3.0-beta4/
[2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/app/

On 09/01/2013 02:09, Johnny Minty wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to build james-server-3.0-beta4 from source using the instructions 
> provided on http://james.apache.org/server/3/dev-build.html however after 
> successfully building the project no distribution binaries are created in the 
> $JAMES_BASE/container-spring/target folder.
>
> I have tried this out with the james-server-3.0-beta1 project shown in the 
> dev-build.html example with on issues but I would like to use the latest code 
> base available.
>
> Please advise whether the build process has changed?
>
> Thanks for our help in advance.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Johnny Minty                               
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to