On 29/01/2013 15:52, Jerry M wrote:
I have a production systemthat's been running 2.x forever. Pretty much
stable with no real problems. I don't have the time, nor do I want to
take the risk at this point to even think about doing a complete
conversion to 3. And technically, it's still in beta, correct? But I
desperately need an IMAP server for a couple of situations. So a few
questions...
1) James 3.x does support IMAP, correct
Correct
2) Is James 3.x / IMAP stable enough to use, assuming I accept the
typicalbeta-code risks?
It all depends on your requirements and user expectations.
If you read the mailing list, the biggest issues so far are related to
thread (spool, remote delivery) not working at a certain time.
Just give it a try...
3) Would you foresee any issues if I install 3.x in the same box with my
production 2.x assuming I attach 3.x to a completely different IP address?
You will have issues if both james use the same ports.
Thanks.
Jerry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscr...@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-h...@james.apache.org
