Thanks a lot Özgür and Benoit for clarifying.

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Benoit Tellier <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Have a look to the configuration file conf/mailetcontainer.xml
>
> To understand the order of execution of mailet, follow these simple rules :
>
>  - Starting point : The root processor.
>  - Order of execution : Sequential. The first mailet you see is applied,
> the the second and then the third....
>  - Condition of execution of a mailet : the matcher clause of your
> mailet. If this condition is not satisfied, then this mailet is skipt.
>  - When to stop : No more mailet to execute ( ie : end of a processor )
> or the state of the mail is changed to GHOST ( which can be done by
> mailets : eg LocalDelivery
>  - Conditionnal jump : you have the ToProcessor mailet that moves the
> orocessed e-mail on top of a new processor of your choice. Combined with
> a matcher, you get a conditionnal jump.
>
> So you just have to insert this where needed :
>
> <processor state="someProcessor" enableJmx=true>
>
> ...
>
>     <mailet matcher="SenderIs" class="ToProcessor">
>         <processor>managed-known-sender</processor>
>     </mailet>
>
> </processor>
> ...
>
> <!-- Add this new processor -->
> <processor state="managedd-known-sender" enableJmx=true>
>     <mailet matcher="SenderHostIs" class="..."/>
> </processor>
>
> Le 18/03/2015 18:40, Hassan Latif a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm struggling to find some text on this. Is there any specific order of
> > execution for the matcher/mailet clauses that are declared in
> > mailetcontainer.conf. Let's say we want to first check whether the Sender
> > is known (e.g. by using SenderIs matcher) and then check whether the
> sender
> > is from a specific host (using SenderHostIs matcher), is there a way to
> > enforce this order of execution?
> >
> > Appreciate your help.
> >
> > -Hassan
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to