> BTW this is also an area that needs to be addressed: corporations > should NOT assume that they ought to service enable everything. And > how should they evaluate this?
William, I believe that a primary goal of 'Service Component Architecture' was to avoid the old binary thinking: "Ya got services and components". No, SCA defines several new levels of granularity: Systems, Sub- Systems, Services, Modules, Components and Intra-Component-Code. SCA encourages multi-grained thinking around containment, mediation, interface, policy, etc. Now, it doesn't address the entire Szyperski granularity list (aforementioned), but it does a much better job than previous efforts (IMHO). In regard to containment-granularity evaluation, this will come down to a matter of best practices. Jeff ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> AIDS in India: A "lurking bomb." Click and help stop AIDS now. http://us.click.yahoo.com/9QUssC/lzNLAA/TtwFAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
