Hi Anne,

I think you're familiar with what we're doing with our
open source ESB, Celtix, or at least I'm sure you are
familiar with our architectural approach.

Are you suggesting it might be of interest to us to
investigate Jini/JS in the context of developing a
plug in for it?

We are doing a CORBA plug in for Celtix at the moment
but of course we are always interested in
recommendations for other plug ins to consider.

Thanks,

Eric


--- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Jini/JavaSpaces is quite different from CORBA. It's
> not at all a
> language-specific reinvention of the same old thing.
> It's worth your time to
> investigate it.
> 
> Anne
> 
> On 3/3/06, William Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Gregg. I'll have a deeper look at that
> site. At first glance
> > this looks like a good environment for a
> technology like Jini. I have
> > a friend that will be very interested in this
> article. What's
> > interesting is the real time (ish) performance. My
> friend has been in
> > this industry (high performance car data
> collection. monitoring and
> > test and configuration etc) for years and can't
> imagine moving from
> > embedded C to Java. I'll have to have him look at
> this - he'll be
> > interested. I'd also be interested in performance
> metrics and
> > performance satisfaction metrics for this example.
> >
> > > I continue to be saddened by the loud voices of
> ignorance that push
> > > away
> > > technologies such as Jini which have so much to
> offer for those
> > > motivated enough
> > > to look.  The problems of SOA and related
> distributed computing are
> > > not simple.
> > >   The Jini platform was put together by people
> who understand the
> > > science.
> >
> > BTW many of us non-Jini-user folks understand good
> science too. I'm
> > not pushing it away - I just think that it has
> it's place and limits
> > like all technologies.
> >
> > > Your interest in native only integration is a
> little
> > > alarming.  To me, it says that your systems are
> living on the edge of
> > > performance, or software development
> platforms/skills are limiting
> > > your choices.
> >
> > Money, licensing, existing incumbant technology,
> existing high
> > performance, mission critical  and
> leave-well-enough alone
> > applications are often limiting my customers
> choices. My customers
> > can't just throw out everything they have and
> rewrite their
> > application in the next new fad of the month.
> They've already
> > invested millions in these applications and are
> doing $billions of
> > business with them. Nor can they insert a wrapper
> layer that will
> > impact their high performance mission critical
> systems - so they want
> > native integration to a standards-based outside
> world. In other words
> > they don't want service enabling technology to
> have a negative impact
> > on their service. (Hence why my customers also
> tend to look more for
> > smart end-point integration than having to use hub
> technology - this
> > may seem contradictory but it is not).
> >
> > Thanks for the link. I promise to make myself less
> ignorant of Jini.
> > I have to say this: from my first look at Jini -
> it looks a lot like
> > a reinvention of CORBA but without the language
> independence
> > obviously. In fact it looks entirely like a Java
> specific reinvention
> > of CORBA. (Which already has a Java language
> binding. Why reinvent
> > this???)
> >
> > In fact when I go back to the F1 example I wonder
> why someone
> > wouldn't use an embedded C CORBA ORB to solve the
> problem? Like other
> > part so the automotive industry are now doing. ??
> >
> > William
> >
> > On Mar 2, 2006, at 10:30 AM, Gregg Wonderly wrote:
> >
> > > William Henry wrote:
> > >> Okay has anyone else had enough of this? Is
> this the Jini list or the
> > >> SOA list?
> > >
> > > William, I'm sorry to strike a sour note with my
> reponses.  I've
> > > sat back and
> > > watched this list for some time and have seen,
> as Gervas pointed
> > > out, many
> > > different themes passing through.  I am
> particularly concerned
> > > about the
> > > re-creation of technologies by the ignorant. 
> So, I am sitting here
> > > trying to
> > > communicate which "features of desire" for the
> week, are already in
> > > place in the
> > > Jini platform.  I've probably (some of the
> responses to yours say
> > > clearly) done
> > > a horrible job of providing a convincing
> argument.
> > >
> > > I continue to be saddened by the loud voices of
> ignorance that push
> > > away
> > > technologies such as Jini which have so much to
> offer for those
> > > motivated enough
> > > to look.  The problems of SOA and related
> distributed computing are
> > > not simple.
> > >   The Jini platform was put together by people
> who understand the
> > > science.  The
> > > fact that the platform doesn't come with a web
> services endpoint,
> > > and that there
> > > is not one visible in the Jini community, should
> speak to where the
> > > real needs
> > > are.  There are, of course other technologies
> that are starting to
> > > reveal an
> > > understanding of the science, and the needs of
> the users.
> > >
> > > Jini has no lack of ability to provide
> performant solutions that
> > > interface to a
> > > wide range of entities.  Your interest in native
> only integration
> > > is a little
> > > alarming.  To me, it says that your systems are
> living on the edge of
> > > performance, or software development
> platforms/skills are limiting
> > > your choices.
> > >
> > > Look at
> > >
>
<http://developers.sun.com/learning/javaoneonline/2005/coolstuff/
> > > TS-1915.html>
> > > for an example of a performant system created to
> interface with low
> > > level
> > > devices.  It provided a winning advantage to the
> F1 team.
> > >
> > > Gregg Wonderly
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 




 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to