> The response was "who needs WS-RM, just use JMS"
I would be interested in real experience reports comparing these two
approaches. How well does WS-RM line up with the various capabilities of
JMS, and how well various vendors' implementations of WS-RM implement
the standard, how well they interop with each other and so on.
Is WS-RM even a standard yet?
Unless someone can produce the information above, I'd have to say the
better investment for the time being would be in JMS.
I am willing to be convinced otherwise, but I've not found a shred of
support for that yet. I'd *really* like to see it so please respond.
I'll have to interpret no response as implying no evidence.
Thanks
-Patrick
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
