MQSeries, like HTTP/SMTP/FTP/etc.., is occasionally used as a
transport protocol, but IME, is primarily used as a transfer protocol.
i.e. it's mostly used to exchange data, not to carry method
invocations.  YMMV, I suppose.

Mark.

On 5/6/06, patrickdlogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In this case MQSeries is just a transport...
>
> Isn't MQSeries more than that? i.e. MQSeries moves things from here to
> there, but in various ways, asynchronously, with queue-based
> semantics, etc. That seems to be much more than "just a transport".
>
> > As is HTTP, FTP, SMTP, etc.
>
> And so aren't these more like MQSeries than they are like "any other
> transport"? i.e. they move things from here to there, but in various
> ways, with certain rules and expectations about sequence,
> sychronicity, identification, etc.
>
> > I found this view drastically simplifies a lot of the confusion
> > around an ESB's role in an SOA...
>
> It seems like an oversimplification to me.
>
> -Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>





SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to