>
> --- Gregg Wonderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's an interesting conclusion to draw Jerry. I
> > don't understand where the
> > logic is in suggesting that any software deployed
> > before there was something
> > called "web services" was not an SOA.
>
> Software deployed before are objects or components. I
> see many in this list do not differentiate Component
> from Service.
Humm, so you think that the software deployed "before" stopped at the objects or
components and that they didn't have any interactions with clients as services?
> > suggest that "SOA" is
> > somehow aligned as a "SW architecture". That seems
> to contradict the basic
> > notion that services go beyond the software level.
>
> Business service should be differentiated from systems
> service. the former is in business terms and the
> latter is in technology terms. The two are
> interdependent and two perspective views.
An SOA must embody the basics of "the business" services or it probably won't be
very valuable to implement and use. Thus the SOA is aligned on the business
needs and the software is a manifestation of the services needed.
Gregg Wonderly
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
