On Fri, 2006-05-19 at 06:35 +0000, patrickdlogan wrote:
> > Hypermedia is a thing that has been studied since the 60s .. if you
> > want to understand some of the thinking behind hypermedia (and
> > hypertext) I suggest reading some work from the 80s .. it was a hot
> > European research topic those days. I'm sure Google can help:
> > http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=hypermedia
>
> Hmm. "Hypermedia". Is that part of the internets our prezdint has bin

Who's president?

> talkn''bout? I heard him say about that on the talkn' picsure box.

Dude, you really should open your mind up a bit more. I didn't make it
up; hypertext is a specialization of hypermedia .. and its been around
for decades. Tim didn't just "invent" the Web out of thin air you know;
its an area that has been studied for decades and SGML, HTML and HTTP
are not the first attempt at solving certain classes of problems.

I'm not making this stuff up; you should join ACM and go thru the
digital library maybe.

> > SOAP does not define any semantics on its own...
>
> Then why try to use a distinct label called "SOAP application
> semantics" and suggest it is different from HTTP's semantics?

Because SOAP application semantics are defined by the application and
hence have nothing to do with HTTP semantics. As you know SOAP can be
carried in email or other forms; therefore by definition the semantics
are not tied to HTTP. I just don't get why this is so hard.

> Everything seems to have a good definition here except for SOAP and
> SOA, which are supposedly the keys to the kingdom.

Never said that; but then you seem to have a knack for changing the
topic.

Sanjiva.





SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to