On May 19, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Mike Glendinning wrote:
> This is, I believe a major problem with the current
> REST approach to machine-to-machine integration, which asserts
> proudly "we don't need no stinking service description". You do -
> you're just hiding it in your client application code!
Hmm...of course you need shared semantics for communication and
of course client code has to be written in terms of shared semantics.
The advantage of REST is that it limits the amount of shared semantics
necessary to an absolute minimum thereby minimizing the coordination
cost between client and service developer.
I cannot see a major problem here, actually :-)
Jan
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
