> >> we find that developers really just want to build their
> >> applications using the easiest toolkit they can find."
>
> > So much for the "Amazon is a poster child for REST" and "SOA has no
> > success stories in the real world" memes :-)
>
> Note the quote says developers want "the easiest toolkit they can
> find". There is no indication these developers give a rip about any
> kind of architecture issue, SOAP, HTTP, SOA or otherwise. They want
> tools to generate complicated code for them. That seems to be the
> message.
SOAP and HTTP are not architectures. Folks have pitted REST vs. SOA
(here and elsewhere) as architectures .. and Mike's note was saying that
the Amazon case is pretty strong proof that here's something to this SOA
thang.
> That says nothing about whether or not SOAP supports a
> better or worse architecture than just HTTP to those who care about
> the architecture of an overall disparate, distributed system.
Who said anything about SOAP? Mike did not. Werner did not either. The
comment from Mike (and the point of the article) was about the genuine
business value of service-oriented architectures.
Sanjiva.
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
