> the other hand does sell a gateway.)
Yes, the Sarvega products. They are pretty good, from what I've seen
of them, as far as they go.
> I agree that XML gateways can't do everything, but I view mediation
> systems as an essential component of service infrastructures, and
> XML gateways have an advantage over other mediation systems in that
> they offer significantly better performance than software-based
> mediators. But also note that my recommendation is to use gateways
> in combination with SOA management.
I think we are in basic agreement on these points. But my real issue
is with any claim expressed or inferred on my part that these are
sufficient and that these move all security issues out of the service
implementations per se. There is still a lot of hard work necessary in
some of many of these service implementations.
-Patrick
SPONSORED LINKS
| Computer software | Computer aided design software | Computer job |
| Soa | Service-oriented architecture |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "service-orientated-architecture" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
