These seems to be very "narrow" view of SOA in that it seems to force a
technology (messaging) onto SOA.
As an abstract concept, messaging is fine, but this usually implies a
particular technology.   I view SOA
as much broader than that as implied by the name.  It is an old concept
that has become popular more recently.
In addition, the concept really requires better standards than are
typically used today to make it useful, IMHO.
Interoperability is critical for SOA, in my view, since one needs to be
able to replace components/services
with different implementations without changing the overall behavior.  I
didn't see this discussed in these articles.
I don't have any other recommendations for SOA in this time frame, however.

Dave
Peter Madziak wrote:
> Chris:

> In my opinion, by far and away the most useful paper I have across on
> SOA is:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">

> A pretty close second is:
>
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url="">

> Peter
>

> On 5/31/06, *Chris* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     Just curious as to what the collective braintrust here thinks are the
>     most significant SOA publications of the last 2-3 years?  Books?
>     White
>     papers? Research publications? Periodicals?
>
>     Also, which researchers or commercial enterprises do you see as
>     tops in
>     the field right now?
>
>     I'm in the process of compiling a "best of" list.  I would appreciate
>     any insights that you might have.  Thanks all!
>
>     /Chris
>
>
>






SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to