On Jun 23, 2006, at 5:16 AM, Todd Biske wrote: > What was interesting was that I deliberately did not call it an SOA > Reference Architecture.
Makes sense - why would you? If you took out company-specific aspects and published it somewhere, Dennis and I could reference it - then it could be called a reference architecture. I guess my opinion in this case is similar to the one I have on standards (and frameworks, for that matter): Once it has been proven to actually work somewhere, it makes sense to turn it into a standard (or reference). Stefan -- Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/ ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Something is new at Yahoo! Groups. Check out the enhanced email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/SISQkA/gOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
