Anne
I see a lot of opportunities for WS-RX AND AMQP. For example,
bridging between systems which use the MOM model and systems that use the
Service model. I also see opportunity for WSRM/RX (and as the chair of the TC
you can expect some bias!) as a truly interoperable model that IBM and Tibco
are both implementing.
There is also an effort in Apache to produce a
pure C version of the WSRM/RX protocol that I hope will perform competitively
with MQ and other persistent reliable messaging engines.
Paul
On 6/23/06, Anne Thomas
Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think this sentence is a bit optimistic:
JMS APIs over AMQ could easily interoperate with .NET clients or any
other language or platform that can communicate via AMQP.
This
would only work if the JMS vendors and Microsoft abandon their investments
in proprietary protocols and adopt AMQP. Such a move might breathe new life
into the MOM market, but can you see 90+% of the Fortune 500 converting
their existing apps from MQSeries and Tibco RV to AMQP? These protocols are
as entrenched as CICS/COBOL.
Where I see a great opportunity is
WS-RX over AMQP.
Anne
On Jun 23, 2006, at 7:22 AM, patrickdlogan wrote:
>
"standardize best practice - yes, if you can, absolutely, like
what
> we're looking into currently with AMQP, but this is not
always
> possible"
>
> Please say
more.
>
--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC
Co-chair
http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Oxygenating the
Web Service Platform",
www.wso2.com
