Stefan Tilkov wrote: > I agree that contract-first is preferable to code-first. What was > referring to, though, was something different: I believe a "service" > is something that is semantically different from a distributed > objects's interface, not just a different messaging protocol. That's > why I'm deeply suspicious of any toolkit that "just" maps CORBA, DCOM > or RMI to SOAP ...
I continue to struggle with the fact that people somehow seem to believe that you can't pass documents in an RMI call. Stefen, what makes you feel that an existing RMI application would always be a badly performing application? Can you discuss your experiences with RMI applications which performed normal method calls, callbacks for eventing and large data transfers to help me understand your experiences and how those might be metering your views? Gregg Wonderly ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
