It's not a matter of training all 4 development groups to use all four development environments. The nature of the situation in most large organizations is that that they have many different development groups, and each group uses different programming environments. Most large organizations do at least a little development in both .NET and Java. So how does a VB developer use JMS? Or how does a Java developer use MSMQ?

Anne

On 6/29/06, Gregg Wonderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
> JMS isn't much use if you're building applications in C#, VB, COBOL, Perl,
> PHP, Python, Ruby, _javascript_, etc.
>
> Language dependency is an anathma to SOA.

Language dependency is an enabling step for some types of language features.
Like all programming opportunities, if you cross the line of binding and
cohesion at places where that limits your choices, then you might have more
trouble in the future.

Why would I use 4 different languages and train 4 different development groups
on the use of 4 different development environments, deployment systems etc?

The important step is to use a programming platform which promotes wire protocol
independence isn't it?

Gregg Wonderly


__._,_.___


SPONSORED LINKS
Computer software Computer aided design software Computer job
Soa Service-oriented architecture


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to