On 7/9/06, Anil John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > In the larger community, I've seen feedback on the OASIS SOA RM [1] fall into > two general categories. > > 1) Alignment with Steve's view as the "..current best stab at definition what > SOA actually is and > while focusing on the software domain its definitions have been deliberately > crafted to apply to other areas, and in particular the > > Business". > > 2) Or folks turning on the bozo bit on the doc as a verbose and overblown > document that adds very little to the discussion. > > Unfortunately in a majority of the cases, view #1 is usually from folks who > have been involved in the OASIS process and/or related standards orgs and not > from the Platform Vendor or the End-User Implementer community. > > Given the make-up of this particular group, it will be interesting to get the > feedback. > > Regards,
Yup. It's well written, concise, has nice diagrams (hi Frank), but in the end it just doesn't provide much in the way of concrete advice. Would somebody *please* just describe the architectural constraints already? Yes, I know that would enable us to say "No, that isn't SOA", but that's the point, isn't it? Mark. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/NhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
