Stefan Tilkov wrote:
We could start DML vs DSL debate ;-)+1. In fact, I don't think there has ever been a "good" UML tool - in the sense of "good for automated software development". Do you agree that: "Proprietary tools which worked mostly were DSL."? But there is no standardised profile for SOA.A UML profile is a poor man's metamodel, so this could conceptually be used with MOF or EMF, too. The problem is that one has to define what the exact SOA metamodel is :-) OMG started SOA SIG (http://soa.omg.org/) only few month ago. Can you guess whether this group goals could be successful? (eg. create SOA metamodel, ...). May be I overestimate necessity of standards. But without standard you get a mess (eg. not cooperating tools...). __._,_.___ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ |
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orientated-ar... Lukas Barton
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orientat... Stefan Tilkov
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orie... Steve Jones
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-... Eric Newcomer
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [serv... Jerry Zhu
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [serv... Gregg Wonderly
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orientat... Ashley at Metamaxim
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orie... Hitoshi Ozawa
- Re: MDA/UML/OO and SOA (was Re: [service-orientat... Eric Newcomer
