Semih Cetin wrote:
> +1 to William's comments.
>
> Just to support William's thoughts, you can find the link below
> about "why objects have failed".
>
> <http://www.dreamsongs.com/ObjectsHaveFailedNarrative.html>
This apparent fussing about something that the author was not prepared to do,
contains the following text near the end:
"But in the end, we don’t advocate changing the way we work on and with objects
and object-oriented languages. Instead, we argue for diversity, for work on new
paradigms, for letting a thousand flowers bloom. Self-healing, self-repair,
massive and complex systems, self-organization, adaptation, flexibility,
piecemeal growth, statistical behavior, evolution, emergence, and maybe dozens
of other ideas and approaches we haven’t thought of—including new physical
manifestations of non-physical action—should be allowed and encouraged to move
ahead."
The author mentions Java as one of the "problems" that he encountered. He
doesn't mention Jini though, which I find curious. He must not of done much
research on systems designed around these things, because that specific space
is
where Jini excels.
Ignorance creates so many more problems than Objects do :-)
Gregg Wonderly
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/service-orientated-architecture/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
