On 11/23/06, Stefan Tilkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2006, at 4:01 AM, Todd Biske wrote: > > > Your architecture may be SOA-compatible if the term application has > > been removed from your company's lexicon. > > I think I agree with your basic point - you should be developing, > deploying, versioning, managing, buying, outsourcing services, not > applications. But in the end, something has to actually *use* all > those services. That's still an "application" in my vocabulary.
IMO, consumers of services are either a) other services, or b) people. The latter would require a completely generic (i.e. useful for *all* services, aka uniformly useful 8-) client-side framework which mediates between people and services. If that sounds familiar, it's because it should 8-) Mark.
