It's a system, not an application. The results of implementing an architecture is a system.
_____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stefan Tilkov Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 4:14 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] Howard of Bloor on SOA On Nov 23, 2006, at 4:01 AM, Todd Biske wrote: > Your architecture may be SOA-compatible if the term application has > been removed from your company's lexicon. I think I agree with your basic point - you should be developing, deploying, versioning, managing, buying, outsourcing services, not applications. But in the end, something has to actually *use* all those services. That's still an "application" in my vocabulary. Stefan -- Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq. <http://www.innoq.com/blog/st/> com/blog/st/
