Its taken 14 years for "people with decades of technical experience"
to trust HTTP. And many of them still don't. I think perhaps we are
gummed up in the trough of despondency :-)

Paul

On 11/23/06, Gervas Douglas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Three things, amongst a million others, have emerged from discussions
> over the years on this Group:
>
> (1) Web Services are not identical to SOA;
>
> (2) Many people with decades of technical experience do not think that
> WS are up to the job of providing the means to build robust, adaptable
> and scalable SOA structures that will stand a reasonable test of time;
>
> (3) Most of the AppServer/middleware/EAI vendors who have transitioned
> to being allegedly primarily SOA vendors seem to be basing their
> offerings at least in significant part on conformance with WS standards.
>
> Bearing in mind (1) and (2), what would you suggest that the vendors
> offer as an alternative to (3)?  If you think the people who believe
> (2) are mistaken, how confident are you that WS will provide a
> satisfactory foundation for SOA-based development over, say, the next
> 6 years (allowing for orderly evolution of WS standards)?
>
> Gervas
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

Reply via email to