On 11/30/06, Stefan Tilkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 30, 2006, at 8:03 AM, Steve Jones wrote: > > > So "graph" isn't a resource? But "GraphId452354" would be? I have to > > say in my reading of REST so far its the former that I've understood > > (and sometimes liked) while the later would just be rubbish as you'd > > have one resource per object instance (i.e. you are arguing that REST > > is on objects, my reading of the subject was that it was on classes). > > That's the misunderstanding, then: REST indeed uses URIs (at least in > general and conceptually) to identify objects (instances), not > classes, via URIs.
Right. Before REST was so named, it was actually called the "HTTP Object Model". I'm not sure why that's rubbish though. Mark.
