Hang on, I'm getting different advice here, my understanding was that URI naming (picking good names) was an essential part of REST. If its an internal identifier then that isn't the case.
So should REST URIs have carefully chosen names, or is banging at the keyboard randomly the prefered approach? On 29/11/06, Jan Algermissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Steve Jones wrote: > o you are saying that it is _bad_ practice in REST to have sensibly > named URIs? URIs are opaque identifiers (just like object references in any OO language). You should not infer anything from a URI. Jan
