Bill, what is the application semantic of 'invoking an object'?
Thanks, Jan On Thursday, April 05, 2007, at 09:22AM, "Bill Barr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Implementing the RMI programming model with the latest RMI release (back >in 2003), in order for an object on the server to be invoked, the object >must first export itself as a resource (protocol accepted at its >endpoint, interface, etc) on the network. The plumbing is different but, >this conforms to the RESTful pattern as I understand it. > >-- >email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >"The 'S' in SOA means service, not server; 1 service != 1 server." > > > >________________________________ > > From: [email protected] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of >Mark Baker > Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 8:52 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] SOA Pizza Order >Surprises > > > > On 4/4/07, Gregg Wonderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ><mailto:gergg%40cox.net> > wrote: > > My question is still why is the RMI (programming model) INVOKE >operation not a > > restful operation? > > Didn't my response to you on Mar 28 not answer that question to >your > satisfaction? Steve seemed to get it, even if he didn't agree >with > the implications. > > Mark. > > > > >
