Nothing has happened with it so far at OASIS. Also I believe one of the motivations for SCA was to keep up with WCF...
Eric ----- Original Message ---- From: John Evdemon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:44:00 PM Subject: RE: [service-orientated-architecture] Seeley on the MS Approach to SOA Many of the capabilities in WCF seem to be available in some form within SCA (at least that was my take on it after I read some of the SCA papers – I haven’t kept up with it since it went to OASIS). From: service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:service- orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com] On Behalf Of Stefan Tilkov Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 2:44 AM To: service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com Subject: Re: [service-orientated -architecture] Seeley on the MS Approach to SOA On Apr 17, 2007, at 6:39 PM, Gervas Douglas wrote: > Microsoft doesn't support the Service > Component Architecture (SCA) and Service Data Objects (SDO) > specifications, which offer similar functionality to .NET. I wonder what this is referring to - what would qualify as the .NET equivalent to SCA and SDO? Not that I'm a big believer in these two specs, just curious. Stefan -- Stefan Tilkov, http://www.innoq. com/blog/ st/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
