Fine grained network distributed operations ..... I think that Deutsch continues to be right! ;)
What I'd say is that in a good RIA you'll have client side services which perform the fine grained elements and then batch up for coarse grained interactions to the backend. That RIA requires the interaction of traditional UI solutions isn't a surprise, nor should it be a surprise that this requires traditional models to make this work properly. Steve On 26/03/2008, Michael Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One of lead architects around me said that SOA and RIA are almost > orthogonal because RIA demands fine-grained operations while SOA tends to > coarse-grained ones... > > - Michael > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Rob Eamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2008 2:37:30 PM > Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Meehan on RIA meets SOA > > Why is that? Why would an RIA be "more connected" to services based on > the interaction style? Why would accessing services via REST vs. any > other mechanism be considered more connected? A service consumer is a > service consumer, regardless of the service interface, no? > > Or are you referring to the relative prevalence of an RIA's use of > services compared to other approaches? > > -Rob > > --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. > com<service-orientated-architecture%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Anne Thomas > Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > RIA and mashups will become more intimately connected with SOA > > if/when REST becomes a predominant approach for building services. > > > > Anne > > > > ------------------------------ > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it > now.<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> > > >
