Strictly speaking, you're right of course. Planning certainly must account for as-is issues. The comment in the article seemed to indicate that planning should stop until the today's issues are fixed. That's where I was leaning toward these being separate issues--one it immediate operations, the other is future planning (which needs to understand/analyze current operations).
-Rob --- In [email protected], "htshozawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Disagree on this. Operation should be included in the planning. > Systems (generally) is failing today because operation is not > throughly thought out during the planning phase. > > H.Ozawa
