Designing in SO is designing for changes.
- Michael ----- Original Message ---- From: htshozawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 12:32:13 AM Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Is Governance Killing SOA? I first thought the difference was just top-down vs. bottom-up, but I'm beginning to feel it's more of sudden vs. gradual. The points Anne brought up can bring a sudden change if all are executed at a point in time. Maybe, that's why it seems indepedent of architectural style. If we break it down to be more of a gradual change, architecture will need to incorporate the requirement of changes. H.Ozawa --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, "Rob Eamon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems that the prerequisite characteristics are independent of > architectural style. So would tying those characteristics to SOA be > inappropriate? > > Is the focus on "transforming IT" misplaced? Perhaps that would be > better viewed as a potential byproduct of pursuing the > characteristics above--which are intended to for an end goal of a > more successful business rather than a goal of "transforming IT." > Aren't we trying to transform/improve the business? > > -Rob >
