Good research, expected results (though I've thought it is a common place) Let me ask you, Master if Tricky Questions, what situation do you mean and why it should be improved?
As of me, I am more interested in what to do to have "B" & "C" personalities start thinking as "A". Governance comprises policies; policy is a single side direction of doing things, it is not a House of Commons discussion. If the whole audience resists a policy, the policy has to be changed. If a part of audience resists a policy, this part of audience might need to be changed. We know What? and Why?, now we need to know How? - Michael ----- Original Message ---- From: jeffrschneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 7:43:04 PM Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Is Governance Killing SOA: Part 2 "Is Governance Killing SOA?" is my simple Rorschach personality test. --- When you read the question did you understand the question to mean: A. Is a LACK of governance killing SOA? or B. Is TOO MUCH governance killing SOA? or C. Is IMPROPER governance killing SOA? Although some people interpret the question to have other meanings, it has been my observation that most people think A or B. After asking this a number of times, my informal results have led to two distinct results: 1. Enterprise Architects, I.T. Analysts, Press and Product Marketers almost always interpret the question to mean "A" (lack of governance) and 2. Application architects, software developers and project managers almost always interpret the question to mean "B" or "C" (too much or poor governance) This begs the question, if Type "A" personalities get their way - will the situation be improved? Jeff
