Yes, I would prefer SO, architecture will come into the picture as one of its components. - Michael
----- Original Message ---- From: Rob Eamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 4:14:34 PM Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Is Governance Killing SOA: Part 2 How about dropping "SOA" from all of that since SO is really tangential.. .. -Rob --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Michael Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] .> wrote: > > Well, we already have a sort of a Civil War in SOA, why do not have a SOA Bill of Rights? > > Unfortunately, a SOA Bill of Rights is another policy... and enforcement in this case can come from those who disagree... "People have rights for information" - It is only unclear how a country which preserves a right for private property, which recognizes information as a property, does not have a right for private information. I mean, a SOA Bill of Rights may be as controversial as anything else. For example, I would like to have a right having bagels instead of donuts... > > How about a Business Plan for SOA Governance? For the start: > > 1) separate governance function from management function > 2) recommend rational set of governance controls (along the project life-cycle) > 3) recommend minimal requirements for SOA testing tools > 4) identify early stages where SO development must closely collaborate with business clients like Concept and Proposal stages > 5) elaborate on end-to-end vision of SOA service > 6) ... > > - Michael
