I agree with Rob. However, coupling between sender and recipient in EDA is 
shifted into more delicate area of intentions (sender) and interests 
(receiver). How technically quantify these categories is a question.
- Michael




________________________________
From: Rob Eamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 8:42:39 PM
Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Roch Clarifies Some Key Terms


Not a bad set of definitions. A couple of discussion items:

EDA is not necessarily pub/sub.

EDA does not result in "completely decoupled" systems. In a 
brokered/intermedia ted approach, they are more loosely coupled, but are 
still coupled in two ways: 1) the messages they exchange; 2) the 
mechanism over which they exchange them. While the recipient doesn't 
care exactly where the message originated, it cares that *something* 
originates it and does so via the intermediary to which it is connected.

-Rob

    


      

Reply via email to