And then when you add in non-repudiation you have a whole other set of challenges.
Steve 2008/12/3 Michael Poulin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree with Rob. However, coupling between sender and recipient in EDA is > shifted into more delicate area of intentions (sender) and interests > (receiver). How technically quantify these categories is a question. > - Michael > > ________________________________ > From: Rob Eamon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, December 2, 2008 8:42:39 PM > Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Roch Clarifies Some Key Terms > > Not a bad set of definitions. A couple of discussion items: > > EDA is not necessarily pub/sub. > > EDA does not result in "completely decoupled" systems. In a > brokered/intermedia ted approach, they are more loosely coupled, but are > still coupled in two ways: 1) the messages they exchange; 2) the > mechanism over which they exchange them. While the recipient doesn't > care exactly where the message originated, it cares that *something* > originates it and does so via the intermediary to which it is connected. > > -Rob > > >
