Ashley, next week I will publish a discussion about DOSOM in my ebisQ blog (http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/service_oriented/)
- Michael ________________________________ From: Ashley at Metamaxim <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 1:32:16 PM Subject: Re: [service-orientated-architecture] I say SOA was never born - How about now? Are WE ready? Hi Michael This is the second time that you have mentioned DOSOM. Google doesn't seem to give anything on DOSOM -- apart from a page saying that you have trademarked the acronym. Can you provide references to it so that I can understand what it is? Thanks Ashley Michael Poulin wrote: > To me, the requirement of end-to-end services implementation is coming > from applying the Service Orientation concept rather than from > anywhere else: when creating a service, you cannot make one part of it > service-oriented and another one not-SO. This is the principal > difference of SO approach from DDD approach, which allows/recommends > constructing domain objects and THEN 'making'(?) them service-oriented. > > I believe, we can manage the coherence between SO and DDD using Domain > Service-Oriented Modelling (DOSOM) and related design. That is, > Service model goes first and defines the scope and boundaries if the > domain objects. The 'Domain' part outlines the business-orientatio n > nature of the service. > > I agree with Anne on the comment about "into the SOA" > > - Michael > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > **
