--- In [email protected], A W <ashra...@...> wrote: > > They are not following the best practice for defining the service > as I think.
Note that I wasn't referring to just services. I meant any type of component, including services. Have you seen a successful swap out of a service implementation with zero consumer impact? > if you define the service as a totally business function without > sticking it to any technology you will have a reusable service. That seems great in theory. Has it ever been achieved in practice? What would be the gain/benefit of swapping out an implementation? Presumably it would be for technical gains such as higher capacity, more efficient use of resources, etc. Would there be zero consumer impact? Hard to say. > Most properly the people fall on the mixing between technology and > business function. Agreed. -Rob > Please revisit the original post in this thread, he provides a good > examples. > All the best > > Ashraf Galal
