Are you implying that everything should be an externalized service or rules? Is the "real" in real flexibility imply RWE?
Just wondering but is there a rules engine or business process engine capable of partial rules reuse or partial process reuse or it is just that they should be made into a service to be reusable? <-topic of my next paper :-) H.Ozawa 2009/5/30 Michael Poulin <[email protected]>: > > > If business people care about flexibility when they organise a process, BPMN > tools are only tools. Real flexibility comes from: > 1) externalsing business decision logic to 'a rules engine' for the process > steps > 2) externalising realisation of the process actions to the services > 3) loose-coupling the process with the action-services via requested > business functionality (vs. explicit binding with the service interfaces) > > [So, what has left from the 'process' if everything is externalised? Do we > need a BPMN tool or service composition tool? ("Do we really, really have to > deal with BPMN and 'processes'?" > http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/service_oriented/2009/04/do_we_really_really_have_to_deal_with_bpm_and_processes.php)] > > - Michael >
