What precisely are your objections to using this forum, Michael? Gervas
--- In [email protected], Michael Poulin <m3pou...@...> wrote: > > Folks, I prefer to continue this discusstion on the eBizQ forum - > http://www.ebizq.net/blogs/service_oriented/. > > - Michael > > > > > ________________________________ > From: jp_morgenthal <jpmorgent...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 1:51:40 PM > Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Michael on the SOA Manifesto > > > I'm posting the response I put on the eBizQ forum here as well. However, for > it to make sense you need to understand that someone replied to Michael's > posting discussing performance of Web applications as an indication of issues > with SOA. > > ------- My response --------- > I take issue with your semantics regarding T-SOA and B-SOA. These > distinctions do nothing but further cloudy the already unclear understanding > of SOA, as evidenced by the response by Mr. Weiss regarding performance on > Web forms. > > A system is a system and an application is an application. We have semantics > that represents these entities just fine. If a system or an application > follows a design pattern that follows an SOA strategy, it doesn't make them > something new. They're still just a system or an application. >
