To be frank, I am not particularly concerned either way, but considering the bifurcations and tangential spin-offs generated by what start out as single discussion threads, I am not sure it matters that much where you take up a discussion.
Gervas --- In [email protected], Michael Poulin <m3pou...@...> wrote: > > I do not have any objections, Gervas, but continuing discussion from the > middle is not the best way to discuss things, would you agree? > - Michael > > > > ________________________________ > From: Gervas <gervas.doug...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 4:24:01 PM > Subject: [service-orientated-architecture] Re: Michael on the SOA Manifesto > > > What precisely are your objections to using this forum, Michael? > > Gervas > > --- In service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com, Michael Poulin > <m3poulin@ .> wrote: > > > > Folks, I prefer to continue this discusstion on the eBizQ forum - > > http://www.ebizq. net/blogs/ service_oriented /. > > > > - Michael > > > > > > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ __ > > From: jp_morgenthal <jpmorgenthal@ ...> > > To: service-orientated- architecture@ yahoogroups. com > > Sent: Tue, October 27, 2009 1:51:40 PM > > Subject: [service-orientated -architecture] Re: Michael on the SOA Manifesto > > > > > > I'm posting the response I put on the eBizQ forum here as well. However, > > for it to make sense you need to understand that someone replied to > > Michael's posting discussing performance of Web applications as an > > indication of issues with SOA. > > > > ------- My response --------- > > I take issue with your semantics regarding T-SOA and B-SOA. These > > distinctions do nothing but further cloudy the already unclear > > understanding of SOA, as evidenced by the response by Mr. Weiss regarding > > performance on Web forms. > > > > A system is a system and an application is an application. We have > > semantics that represents these entities just fine. If a system or an > > application follows a design pattern that follows an SOA strategy, it > > doesn't make them something new. They're still just a system or an > > application. > > >
