I think this is your bug report: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=8022893
I have updated Affected Versions to include 8 as well. The change will take a day or so to propagate. /Staffan On 26 aug 2013, at 12:08, Alexandre De Champeaux <a...@quartetfs.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I was able to reproduce the bug running java 8 (build b103, and so hotspot > build 25.0-b45). So I would like to update the bug report to java 8. I don't > have access to it though. Should I post a new one? > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Alexandre De Champeaux <a...@quartetfs.com> > wrote: > Ok thanks. I just posted a bug report to bugs.sun.com describing the issue > (id 9005974). > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 13/08/2013 09:11, Alexandre De Champeaux wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I posted this message a few days ago in the discuss mailing list. This one >> seems way more accurate though, so i am posting it again. >> >> Following his blog post >> (http://jeremymanson.blogspot.fr/2013/07/lightweight-asynchronous-sampling.html), >> I have been trying to use the code Jeremy Manson proposes to use the >> AsyncGetCallTrace function. >> Although it works smoothly on small examples, I see some impossible >> stacktraces on real world projects, with complex interface structures. I >> have posted a bug report that reproduces it and gives more details here : >> https://code.google.com/p/lightweight-java-profiler/issues/detail?id=1 >> >> I am trying to estimate if those stacktraces are sparse (seems to be so), >> and so if a profiler that uses this feature will be reliable. >> >> Any known bugs / limitations of the AsyncGetCallTrace function? >> This function being undocumented, in what extent does it stays up to date? >> >> Thanks for your answers >> >> Alex > When you say you've posted a bug report, does this mean to bugs.sun.com? > While not technically supported, it is known to be used by some products so > if there is an issue (and I remember this had a long bug tail originally) > then it would be good to track it. > > -Alan. > >